Legal Disclaimer macross-prototypes-Ai-consuls

Legal disclaimer

timeline-timestamps-lawsuits and everything else about the lagal procedure are in the rcp sections and subsections.

No official response yet, and no other reason for the macross similarities cyberattack followed/following, spotted and documented surveillance along with the « other » people, functioning for someone else or send by the time-need.path set by this specific situation.

The war algorithm is the last thing that can come out of the information that was inside the usb, the difference being ,the guns themselves that simplify the automatization process, this means that this was not necessarily known by however started the « search » on me, distributed the info or was looking for where the information came from, this is so because the system was written and thought for small intervention units of private military contractors, thus the system was well suited for this pourpose as will be shown later in this article, the info was also contained in two different « realities », standard squad tactics of overlapping fields of fire, and history/law/science fiction, making it « invisible » by just glancing at it, thus i felt there was no inmmediate danger, besides the specific weapons listed that could have triggered a red flag, leading to this information.

Regardless of what happened the only real red flags were the cheap helicopter and anti satelite missile and the missile shield that also come from the same general idea, but didnt had the formula to use them even if it could have been reverse engineered and the battlegroups for a small military strike force that will have been almost similar in paractice to what youll find in any military manual.

The AI altough based in the Rex-Command tank and the small carrier lacked the formula that allow the drones and carries to be autonomous thus they will have been seen only as a different doctrine, that might or might not have worked, because the rex tank used the drones as defensive and recon units and the carrier was a smaller version used for « mining ».

On the legal profit anyone trying to use them will have found himself in the same situation as i did, weapons companies are mostly goverment owned or subsidiaries so selling the systems will have been difficult as they will have been built anyway by someone else with different configurations due to the « intelligence » wall, so they could only have been presented as an specific piece of equipment and not as a general idea for any profit.

The AI that allows the hardware to function is somewhat similar to the one used by the cyberwar entity, it will set up command centers and launch macross attackas depending on the target responses, it will blend in between regular adds, news feeds and contacts, but time stamps, unknown activity by the user, overall context, continuity and the loctions of where the site is located will show its there, so its not based only on personalised news feed but on an overall idea, that will detect it like a search engine, so its beyond google, social media or anything else through the use of autonomous consuls, they will just send the information from all different sources available depending on context and response, like my specific case wich will go on forever, regardless of ip, or other methods as it already detects the names and overall idea, so it blends between automatic follow up streams, available sources and very likely other supercomputers specifically designed for such pourpose.

Altough there are probably at least a few of them guiding some large plan, there could be any number of smaller « consuls » sending and recovering information, so most likely they will reamain for indefinite periods of time as they target the user, however the longer it goes the more the context is lost, nevertheless it could create other situations unknown for the user by directly targeting it, using a system like the papantla flyers strategy, wich is probably what is used by the cyberwar entities, you can follow the time stamps and the macross used in my facebook timeline and twitter also in the rcp-legal disclaimer-archive categories, to be able to see it you have to crossreference posts from lanovela and srvkynan streaming, but its not entirely necessary, the macross are divided in short segments usually between 3 to 9 post and some other post that signals a separation, the post also are continous meaning they will probably have less than 2 minutes for each segment, here you can see the index for the « characters in the timelines » and the entity « sci-fi story ».

As for the contents of the usb-s,hard drives etc. only the sci-fi and pmc were in the same place or folders, and thats the only thing that can be taken from the sci/fi, the shield, carriers and tank, they all follow a similar pattern once the AI is understood, this means that once i figured out the AI and consecuences i created the sci-fi story, wich was added as a buffer given the somewhat low probability of someone actualy reading it and guessing and even if they did, they could not have know i knew for certain or would have use it regardless.

Coincidentaly regardless of why the attack was done, it goes back to the PMCs although in a different way and the increased need for security for the larger buffer zones created by UFOs , this also shows the connection between the weapons, the games and its consecuences, and how someone could have guessed it from my data.

The AA was somewhere in those files and its not inmediately relevant to the rest but is the simplest to understand, however it does require the formula to be cost/effective, this is similar to the missile shield and the tank shields.

There is also the problem of the timeline for makng the weapons public to avoid any repercussion legal or other type, since depending on when, where and the weapons released, it could have different economic and social repercussions.

The timeline looks like this*****.aa-missiles/ anti-satellite missile/carriers/squads/missile-shield/tank-shields/rex-tank-ai .

This is also more or less how i wrote it the first time.

I didnt have social media before 2010 or so and it didnt have any personnal information that will allow identification without knowing what to look for my personnal communications was only through e-mail or phonecalls and my current social media was initialy created with the pourpose of documenting this situation altough it still does that, is now used for everything else, i currently do not have acces to old accounts (altough i have tried to acces them)but there is nothing there, before that the information was stored in a usb but was moved between different hard-drives and computers wich might or might not have had personnal information in any case the usb is lost.

Between the accident regular investigations and the cyberattacks followed by the unknown people acting like surveillance (gangstalking) it took around 2 and half years before it all got together, this is before the almost 2 and a half years i was in bed due to the injuries i had, so eventually the situation became unavoidable, but not obvious as to what it really was.

Most likely scenario is an investigation following the accident i had wich was also followed by some other agency and eventualy by whoever had acces to the data files elsewhere in the world.

In any case all systems are required for the jericho and enough time has passed for everything except the AI, that was recently released and as of now it only has one pourpose, since anything else will be done by some other type of guiding system, so basically there were two real threats the jericho wich is no longer a threat and the ai, wich could become an ever increasing threath.

The city is the law-system required to survive the buffer zone and technological progress, at the worst-case scenario, that will force people to inhabit them.

The Red Cat project game which will be renamed, it takes the worst possible scenario for the « battlegroups » to appear in the « buffer-zones » outside the « city » operating autonomously, by the « war » algorithm, here is a video that simplifies the AI, army regular operations and the REX command tank operation, using the net strategy wich is a mix of ambush and kite tactics.


The to be or not to be is a byproduct of the autonomous weapon systems, since they can be deployed, on “other peoples battlefields” and it will be difficult to find out who did it.

Something similar will happen in the buffer zones since “strategic choke points” will exist for any third party to attack, as the most obvious ones will be visible for everyone that is paying attention and those closer to the area may not want to take action for it is counterproductive to their interest, thus reducing in a certain way their offensive operational area.

This has the advantage of creating a buffer peace, as all the “shields” will be deployed almost simultaneously, thus skipping the internal chaos these tactics could create if they had been deployed with the Jericho.

Finally this seems to create a new apparently universal continuity doctrine since a similar thing will happen on land/sea/air and space since even distant future combat space fleets seem to be bound by this rules.

Doctrine and missile defense.

Modern military doctrine relies on speed and air superiority, airstrikes, speed, control points.

So at the beginning of an invasion, there will be a rush to target any strategic position and then control areas will be established, from these areas a speed and support approach will be used at selected targets. a battle group will control a large area and move when needed,

This new doctrine functions with the birdshot AA, it simply moves with as little equipment as possible to occupy a large area, thus reducing the battlegroups offensive operational area.

This is possible because weapon systems are now able to operate autonomously, for prolonged periods of time without the need of an upper network and they could be UFOS meaning deployed by anyone from anywhere.

This also creates a new type of warfare, similar to submarine warfare, except that this system most likely will remain dormant like mines and move along the perimeter of larger targets and their own autonomous defenses.

Something similar will happen on land, at its simplest form the weapons are multitarget-landmines that will be scattered on the battlefield, with battlegroups support, the difference with the sea ones, is that they will be cheaper, and destroying them not cost/time effective, at the same time this will create buffer zones, since defense will be made easier, forcing the attacker to mass its forces somewhere in a cost/benefit paradigm, similar to what the birdshot and the space missile defense systems will create once deployed in several countries, as they will overlap each other and be backed by precision/speed made current ones, instead of the prepositioned vector prototypes of the birdshot and space missile defense.

The AA will reduce stealth effectiveness, for each independent gun guarding an area, as the guns only need to know how many there are and where, to increase their accuracy, unlike current AI systems that require the AA to bypass aircraft’s stealth and like with the missiles a few hits will disable the aircraft.

Using both systems AA batteries could be guarded by missile shields and if possible supported by precision anti-air systems, like the iron dome. S-400 series or any other, thus reducing ranges against ground targets that had been increasing over time, and increasing them for unarmored air targets.

The Jericho

The Jericho is the action that in theory could have created major power vacuums if used at the right time, there are two ways in which this could have been accomplished, the first one is if the birdshot missile defense creating a large military intervention they could have been used right from the start, if they cannot or it’s not that easy they will require a long war to be used constantly however this will need to be done in such a way that retreat it’s not possible.

The second case is much less dangerous since at worst a retreat will have been enough, not being many reasons for most to remain in hostile territory.

The first case used at different places and attacking different targets could have created a chain reaction, anywhere in the world where it was used, by someone not directly involved in the conflict due to the simplicity of the weapon system, this could also be used with the « entity » to spread propaganda before and after.

Most likely scenarios

There are two most likely scenarios the videogames dilemma that will be explained below and an attack this second scenario will require knowledge of the independent ai systems, however its repercussions are limited by time, it will simply set a target me for example and launch cyberattacks to get a political reaction, however in this case the reaction wanted was the buffer zones created by the new weapons, wich it forced me to publish, nevertheless given the time passed this is its only inmmediate repercussion until the systems start functioning on a regular basis.

Or the attack was aimed at the weapons and not the ai, however this will show an external threat, given the end result created by the new ai and its buffer zones, along with my own personnal history, because of this facts the first scenario is the most likely one, however its quite possible the attack was used anyway or dragged along the weapons/ai situation, at least the attack is verifiable by me and documented as mentioned above.

The videogames dilemma

There is now a similar problem for the new squads and their individual AI for them to function. should they be released inmmediatly or just leave the AI as it is, and after that when should they be released.

For practical pourposes videogames and simulations allow anyone for the time being to bypass goverment rules on weapons manufacture.

This could also be the most practical political reason since the information seems to have been out there for some time or at least there are many similarities specifically the AI and consequences, but no practical application for anyone except superpowers due to connection issues 5g and so on until now, this also means that there was no direct connection between the networked AI and my independent autonomous AI except for what was implied, by the sci-fi story contained within the same files.

From my own point of view enough time has passed for anyone interested in the AI or its weapons along with its political repercussions, or the claim of intellectual property rights, they could have done it already since no one knew about the « independent » AI systems, (no one did to my knowledge or there isnt any evidence of doctrines adjusting to this new dilemma so far).

The macross used in the cyber attacks show and understanding of the consequences and knowledge of the weapons but fail to see the consecunces caused by the new systems, at any point in time, at the same time this forces the publication of the weapons but it also allows me to just ignore the AI.

So the political reason will be the autonomous weapon systems and its consecuences wich vary between the networked and the independent systems, for the networked systems the issue is tyranny, for the independent systems the issue is similar however they will likely affect already vulnerable zones, creating even larger security buffer zones, refugees, etc.

Basically they create an ever increasing danger around the world, the more zones are lost and the better and more widespread this weapons get.

For me its just a matter of continuing what i was already doing, on a side note if none of this had happened i could just have waited until a relative peace time period to directly publish the AI, the squads or the weapons so it does show a political motivation knowing that the AI was a possibility or a blind guess that went past the point of no return, however this has its own problems as mentioned above.

For the overall legal situation you can visit this covers any other reason that might arise, and it was created following this very specific situation so basically the weapons created the situation, the situation created the site.

The weapons


rcp holdings publication